Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
Kyle faults churches that refuse communion to others over disagreements, and he also faults churches that let anyone partake. How can a church guard the Lord's table without using it to tear the Bride of Christ apart?
Another way to ask: Kyle is against refusing communion over disagreements, and he is also against letting just anyone take it. How can a church protect the Lord's table without using it to divide Christians?

Direct Answer

Kyle calls for both things at once. A church keeps the table for those who hold the faith, and it refuses to break communion over small disputes. He does not give a full procedure, but the early church examples offer a starting point.

Support from the Message

- Kyle says the final breaking point in many divisions is that groups can no longer take communion with each other. - He also faults churches that allow anyone to partake. - He describes those at the heavenly table as people baptized into the kingdom of God who have put on Christ and live in accordance with Jesus and the apostles' doctrines. - Ignatius urges one Eucharist, and Kyle says we should turn our hearts to have our Lord in common. - Irenaeus kept fellowship with churches that differed over Easter.

Discussion Follow-up

Where is your church more likely to err, by dividing too quickly or by guarding too little? What would a better balance look like in practice?