Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
When churches argued over the date of Easter and some were ready to excommunicate others, Irenaeus urged that no bishop should cut off churches united in faith and fellowship. What can we learn from how he decided which differences were worth breaking communion over?
Another way to ask: Some churches were ready to cut off others over the date of Easter, but Irenaeus said no. What can we learn from how he decided which differences were worth breaking communion over?

Direct Answer

Irenaeus measured the difference by faith and fellowship. A different practice in keeping a feast did not justify breaking communion, because the churches were still united in the faith.

Support from the Message

- Churches in Rome and the West kept Easter on a Sunday, while churches of the East and Asia Minor kept it on the actual day of Passover. - The dispute became so bad that the West was ready to excommunicate the others. - Eusebius records Irenaeus declaring that no bishop should separate those churches from communion for such a reason. - Kyle says it worked. The churches kept their own practices, honored each other, and labored to keep one Eucharist. - Kyle concludes that breaking communion was reserved for people who left the faith or churches that went way off the deep end.

Discussion Follow-up

Which differences among Christians today would pass this test, and which would fail it? Have you ever treated a small qualm as a reason to separate?