Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
The early Christians were dogmatic about the basics of the Apostles' Creed, yet they were no spiritual policemen about wording beyond it. What does that balance tell us about how they understood the Christian faith, and why did they expect more from teachers than from ordinary believers?
Another way to ask: The early Christians stood firm on the basics but did not police people's wording beyond them. What does that show about how they saw the faith, and why did they expect more from teachers?

Direct Answer

They saw the faith as a plain set of basics that could not be negotiated, and they allowed room on wording beyond those basics. Teachers and bishops carried a higher expectation than other believers.

Support from the Message

- The non-negotiable matters included one God the Father Almighty, His Son Jesus Christ, Christ's death for us, His resurrection, the resurrection of the flesh and judgment day. - David Bercot says most of their battles dealt with these basic things and involved no complicated theology. - Being undogmatic did not mean they stood for nothing, as some assumed when he raised the topic. - They were not "spiritual policemen" waiting to grab someone over how a thing was phrased. - A believer who held the Apostles' Creed was fine, while a teacher with something far off would be talked to.

Discussion Follow-up

Which beliefs does your church treat as essential, and which are only matters of wording? How would you tell the difference?