Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Jason Logoluso says the early Christians did not read Scripture in a vacuum. How did keeping the whole context of a topic in mind, including the Old Testament, shape their interpretation of a passage, and how does that differ from building a teaching on one verse?
Another way to ask: The early Christians kept the whole Bible's teaching on a topic in mind when they read a passage. How did that help them, and how is it different from building a teaching on one verse?

Direct Answer

They brought everything Scripture says on a topic to the passage in front of them, drawing on both Testaments. That guarded them against making a whole teaching out of one verse.

Support from the Message

- Jason says that when they interpret a verse, they have the whole context of the topic in their minds. - He contrasts this with focusing on one verse only and coming up with an idea or teaching from it. - They drew on the verses of the New Testament and, where it applied, the Old Testament too. - He says people who claim that context is king usually are not taking all the scriptures in context. - He describes trading verses with Jehovah's Witnesses as fruitless, and he says the early explanations of Christ and the Father cleared up his confusion.

Discussion Follow-up

When has a single verse been used against you, or by you, to settle a question? How might a whole-context reading have changed that conversation?