Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Divine Mysteries: Exploring the Trinity, Evil, and Human Destiny  /  Why God Permits Evil  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 9
Bercot argues Augustine’s model would mean “God was defeated,” Satan “won,” and God would have to “arbitrarily choose people” for life or damnation; what assumptions about sovereignty, foreknowledge, election, and assurance are being confronted here, and where do you find yourself resisting the early Christian idea that God’s purpose depends on real human response?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Augustine’s view can make it seem like Satan “won” and God must pick people for salvation or damnation without their real response. Which beliefs about God’s control, foreknowledge, choosing (election), and assurance does this challenge, and where do you resist the idea that God’s plan depends on human response?

Direct Answer Bercot confronts the assumption that sovereignty requires God to determine outcomes apart from human response; he argues true sovereignty includes God achieving His purpose while still allowing real human choice. He also challenges an election model that becomes “arbitrary” if humans are totally unable to respond.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says Augustine/Luther/Calvin imply: humans “no longer have free will,” so God’s plan to fill the universe with beings who freely love Him would be “thwarted.”
  • He draws the conclusion: then God would have to “arbitrarily choose people either for eternal life or eternal damnation, not based whatsoever on anything to do with them.”
  • He calls that “unthinkable” to early Christians: it would mean “the Almighty God was defeated by a mere angel… Satan is the victor.”
  • He redefines sovereignty: a sovereign God is not defeated; “God’s purposes never return to him empty… what he has willed is exactly what will happen.”
  • On foreknowledge, he notes Abraham: God says “for now I know,” and Bercot comments early Christians held God “in His foreknowledge knew” Abraham would pass, “but he knew it because Abraham passed the test.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you instinctively place assurance—on God’s determination, or on God’s faithfulness as you respond in obedience? What parts of Bercot’s critique feel like a threat to God’s glory, and why?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next