Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 2
In the Orwell *1984* illustration, Bercot calls falsifying history “lying on a mass scale”; when he later says this same kind of history-making has entered the church through feminism, what picture of spiritual warfare and deception about God’s order is he presenting, and how should that reshape how we evaluate popular Christian narratives?
Another way to ask: If changing history is “lying on a mass scale,” what is Bercot saying is happening in the church, and why does he connect it to feminism? How should this affect the way we judge popular Christian stories and trends?

Direct Answer The transcript presents falsified history as a tool of deception that can reshape what Christians feel allowed to believe, especially about “God’s order” of headship. Bercot’s point is that when history is rewritten to make Scripture seem cruel or outdated, people stop caring what the Bible commands and start looking for loopholes.

Support from Transcript:

  • Orwell’s example shows power controlling people by “physically chang[ing]” records so the public believes a false past.
  • Bercot says fabricating history is “lying on a mass scale” and compares it to what totalitarian regimes did.
  • He claims the U.S. entered this “Orwellian world where history is shaped and fabricated at will,” and says “Rather, it was feminism.”
  • He warns feminists have “largely reshaped New Testament history as well,” which should concern Christians because feminism opposes God’s order “for the home, the church, and society.”
  • He describes the strategy: portray first-century men as “incredibly oppressive” and women as “meek, innocent victims,” so hearers “aren’t going to care what the Scriptures say.”
Discussion Follow-ups What Christian stories about “what the ancient world was really like” make you immediately feel Scripture must be reinterpreted? How can we test those stories without becoming cynical?