Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 2

The lesson claims early Christians were “in a much better position than we are to understand the New Testament correctly” because they heard apostolic oral teaching and spoke the same coined Greek; what specific implications does Bercot draw from that for how we should treat modern Bible translations, commentaries, and “so-called scholars”?

Another way to ask: Bercot says early Christians understood the New Testament better because they heard the apostles and knew the same Greek. So how does he think we should view today’s Bible translations, commentaries, and Bible scholars?

Direct Answer Bercot implies we should give serious weight to how early Christians interpreted Scripture, because modern scholars may not actually know what key Greek terms meant in the apostles’ day and may translate passages differently than the earliest readers understood them.

Support from Transcript:

He argues early Christians could ask apostles directly: “Hey, what did you mean here, John…?”
He says they spoke the same “coined Greek” as the apostles, while language meanings change over time (illustrated by “gay” changing from “happy” to “homosexual”).
He claims modern scholars “don’t” truly know how Greek words were used in AD 50: “The truth is they don’t.”
He observes early Christian writings often show they understood NT Greek “differently than what our commentators and so-called scholars…understand it,” and “differently than the way those passages are translated in our Bibles.”
Therefore, “if we’re seeking truth,” we have “every reason” to learn how early Christians understood the NT.

Discussion Follow-ups He doesn’t say to reject translations outright, but he does press listeners to test modern interpretations against pre-controversy, early-Christian reading.

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 2 of 10