Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
Bercot uses Romans 5:12 to describe how he once heard the verse say more than its actual words said about inheriting Adam’s guilt. What are some doctrines or favorite proof texts where modern Christians may be adding a theological explanation to the text and then treating that explanation as the text itself?
Another way to ask: Bercot says he once read Romans 5:12 as teaching more than the verse actually said about inheriting Adam’s guilt. What are some doctrines or favorite Bible verses where Christians may add an explanation, then treat that explanation as if it were the verse itself?

Direct Answer

The transcript specifically identifies Romans 5:12 and the doctrine of inheriting Adam’s guilt as Bercot’s example; it does not provide a list of other modern doctrines or proof texts. However, it does warn that this problem can occur whenever Christians treat a plausible theological explanation as though it were the actual wording of Scripture.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says he was raised to believe “all humans inherit the guilt of Adam’s original sin.” - He was shown Romans 5:12 as proof: “Through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin; and so death spread to all men, because all sinned.” - He admits his mind heard the verse as saying, “because all men inherited the sin and guilt of Adam.” - He later realized he was hearing “preconceived interpretations, not the plain language of Scripture.” - He says that view is “a plausible explanation” and “perhaps it is the correct explanation.” - But he adds, “There are other plausible interpretations in that verse.”

Discussion Follow-ups

A careful group could examine any favorite proof text by asking: What does the verse actually say, and what am I importing into it?