Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Bercot says that although most Christians would deny that they can change truth by their beliefs, their actions often show otherwise when they ignore Scriptures, resist alternate interpretations, or avoid uncomfortable evidence. Where do you see this temptation most clearly in modern Christianity?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Christians often say they cannot change truth, but they act like they can when they ignore Bible verses, reject other views, or avoid hard evidence. Where do you see this problem most clearly in Christianity today?

Direct Answer

The transcript does not give specific modern examples, but it identifies the temptation clearly: Christians may protect their doctrines by ignoring Scripture, refusing alternate interpretations, selecting biased translations, or avoiding evidence that challenges them. In modern Christianity, this would apply anywhere believers defend inherited views rather than honestly examine whether Scripture supports them.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says, “I think we all would claim to recognize this principle,” meaning that people say they know belief cannot change truth. - Yet he adds, “our actions show otherwise.” - He says, “we do purposely ignore scriptures that oppose our doctrines.” - He says, “we do refuse to admit that other interpretations of key scriptures might be correct.” - He warns that “most of us refuse to even look at evidence that might prove that our interpretations are wrong.” - He concludes that, subconsciously, “we really do think we can change eternal truths by manipulating scripture or hiding evidence.”

Discussion Follow-ups

Because the transcript does not name particular denominations, controversies, or doctrines, any modern application should be made humbly. The key issue is not “other Christians’ bias” but whether we ourselves avoid truth that threatens our beliefs.