Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
Bercot says that gradual drift is “hardly a reason to discredit the Christians of the 2nd century” but rather “a good reason to discredit Christians of the 20th and 21st centuries.” How does this reversal challenge the modern assumption that newer forms of Christianity are usually clearer, freer, or more biblically mature?
Another way to ask: Bercot says slow drift is not a good reason to reject second-century Christians, but it may be a reason to question Christians of the 20th and 21st centuries. How does this challenge the idea that newer Christianity is usually clearer, freer, or more biblical?

Direct Answer

The reversal challenges the idea that later Christianity is automatically purer or more mature by arguing that more time may mean more drift, not more faithfulness. In the transcript, closeness to the apostles makes second-century Christians less suspect than modern Christians.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot accepts that “century after century” the Church has “drifted slightly.” - He says accumulated small changes can cause the Church to drift “pretty far from the original gospel.” - He argues this is “hardly a reason to discredit the Christians of the 2nd century.” - Instead, it is “a good reason to discredit Christians of the 20th and 21st centuries.” - His reasoning is that “the 2nd century Christians had less than one century of drift.” - Modern Christians, by contrast, “have had 19 and 20.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not claim every later development is false, but it warns against assuming that newer automatically means more faithful.