Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
Bercot asks, “If they did [misunderstand the apostles], what hope is there for us?” How does this question confront modern confidence in individual interpretation, personal Bible study, and denominational assumptions about being more faithful than earlier generations?
Another way to ask: Bercot asks, “If they misunderstood the apostles, what hope is there for us?” How does this question challenge our confidence in personal Bible study, private interpretation, and the belief that our denomination is more faithful than earlier Christians?

Direct Answer

The question confronts modern confidence by pointing out that Christians closest to the apostles were in a better historical position than we are. If even they could not understand the apostles, then modern individuals and denominations should be cautious about assuming superior faithfulness.

Support from Transcript

- The transcript says Polycarp and Clement of Rome “received the gospel directly from the apostles.” - Bercot asks, “How could they possibly have misunderstood them?” - He follows with the challenge: “If they did, what hope is there for us?” - Irenaeus is said to have received the gospel from those who got it directly from the apostles. - Bercot argues that the second-century Christians had “less than one century of drift.” - By contrast, he says modern Christians have had “19 and 20” centuries of drift.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not reject Bible study, but it does challenge isolated modern confidence that ignores early Christian witness.