Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 6
In the quotation from Luther’s response to Erasmus, Luther uses contemptuous language against his opponent; how should serious Christians evaluate theological teachers whose doctrine may seem strong but whose spirit toward opponents seems unlike Jesus?
Another way to ask: Luther used harsh and insulting words against Erasmus. How should serious Christians judge teachers whose doctrine seems strong, but whose attitude toward opponents does not seem like Jesus?

Direct Answer

The transcript suggests Christians should not evaluate teachers only by the force of their arguments, but also by the spirit and methods they use. If a teacher uses contempt, denunciation, or verbal aggression, that should raise concern even if his doctrine appears strong.

Support from Transcript

- Luther’s response to Erasmus is described as using “earthly language and contempt.” - Luther calls Erasmus’s book “so mean and vile” and refers to it as “vile trash.” - The author comments, “In court, no lawyer would be allowed to address his opponent in such contemptible language.” - He adds, “But all is fair in theological wars,” criticizing that attitude. - The chapter says modern theologians may bury opponents in “a barrage of epithets and denunciations.” - The author connects this spirit to weak argumentation through the anecdote: “Weak point: Yell like mad.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not provide a full standard for judging all teachers. But it clearly warns that contemptuous treatment of opponents is not a mark of honest pursuit of truth.