Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Bercot compares Justin’s use of philosophers before Romans and Old Testament prophets before Jews with Paul’s use of Greek poets at the Areopagus. How should Christians today discern the difference between wisely communicating with an audience and compromising the source of their message?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Justin used philosophers when speaking to Romans, just as Paul used Greek poets in Athens. How can Christians today speak in ways people understand without changing the message?

Direct Answer

According to the transcript, Christians wisely communicate when they choose arguments that will have weight with their audience while still proclaiming the Christian message. Compromise would be treating outside sources as the origin or authority of the faith rather than as points of contact.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says many early writings were “apologies written to explain Christianity to non-believers.” - The apologists used philosophers’ quotations to show “the reasonableness of Christianity to the educated Romans.” - Justin used philosophical parallels in his *First Apology* to Roman readers. - In *Dialogue with Trypho*, addressed to a Jew, Justin “quoted heavily from Moses and the Old Testament prophets.” - Bercot explains that Justin “used the arguments that would have the most weight with his audience.” - Paul similarly quoted Greek poets at the Areopagus, but Bercot calls it “absurd” to claim Paul derived his beliefs from them.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not give a full modern method of discernment, but it clearly distinguishes audience-sensitive communication from borrowing the substance of doctrine.