Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
The chapter gives manuscript evidence for early Christian writings, including Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Alexandrinus, and writings preserved across many languages and regions. How should the historical preservation of these writings affect the seriousness with which Christians engage them?
Another way to ask: The chapter gives evidence that early Christian writings were preserved in manuscripts like Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Alexandrinus, and in many languages and places. How should this careful preservation affect how seriously Christians study these writings?

Direct Answer

Bercot argues that Christians should take the early Christian writings seriously because they are historically well attested and not easily dismissed as later inventions or corruptions. Their preservation across ancient manuscripts, regions, and languages gives them value as a reliable historic source.

Support from Transcript

- He says, "next to Scripture itself, few ancient writings are better attested to than the early Christian writings of the first and second centuries." - Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest Greek manuscript of the entire New Testament, also contains "the Epistle of Barnabas" and part of "the Shepherd of Hermas." - Papyri from around 290 contain "a sizable portion of the Shepherd of Hermas." - Codex Alexandrinus contains Clement’s "Letter to the Corinthians" and the sermon known as "Second Clement." - He says the writings were preserved across places "from Western Europe to Africa" and "from the Middle East to Russia," and in many languages. - He adds, "I know of no scholar, Catholic, Protestant, or Agnostic, who questions the authenticity of these works."

Discussion Follow-ups

For Bercot, preservation does not make them Scripture, but it does make ignoring them irresponsible.