Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
Bercot insists that he is not trying to undermine confidence in Scripture, but wants confidence to be “based on truth and sound reasoning, not on blindness.” What would a truthful and sound confidence in Scripture look like in light of the translation issues he raises?
Another way to ask: Bercot says he is not trying to weaken trust in Scripture. He wants trust based on truth and good thinking, not blindness. What would that kind of trust in Scripture look like when we know about translation issues?

Direct Answer

A truthful confidence in Scripture would acknowledge real translation issues without denying the authority or value of Scripture. It would seek to read Bible translations as the apostles intended, using sound reasoning, linguistic awareness, and historic Christian testimony rather than blind assumptions.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot explicitly says, “I’m not bringing up all these things in order to undermine your confidence in the Scriptures.” - He wants confidence “to be based on truth and sound reasoning, not on blindness.” - He says “our Bible translations need to read the way the Apostles would have intended them to read.” - He points out that translators must interpret capitalization, commas, quotation marks, and Greek wording. - He argues that when the Greek can be translated in more than one way, Christians should “lean heavily” on early Christian understandings. - He frames early Christian evidence as “historic evidence of how the New Testament terms were used and understood.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript suggests that honest confidence is not threatened by translation complexity; rather, it is strengthened by facing that complexity responsibly.