Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 4
Bercot says the Greek New Testament had no capitalization, commas, or quotation marks, so translators must add interpretation even before readers open their English Bibles. How does this challenge the common claim that Christians rely on “the Bible alone”?
Another way to ask: Bercot says the Greek New Testament had no capital letters, commas, or quotation marks. Translators must add some meaning before we read it in English. How does this challenge the idea that Christians use “the Bible alone”?

Direct Answer

Bercot argues that “the Bible alone” is impossible in a strict sense because every English Bible already contains translational interpretation. Before readers encounter the text, translators have made decisions about capitalization, punctuation, quotation marks, and meaning.

Support from Transcript

- He says the point is “illustrating the fallacy of our saying that we rely on the Bible alone.” - He states, “We have no choice but to add something to the Bible.” - One necessary addition is “an interpretation of how to translate the Greek.” - The original Greek had no capitalization, so translators must decide between “Spirit” and “spirit.” - He adds that the Greek New Testament “also had no commas or quotation marks.” - He notes from legal experience that “the placement of a comma can significantly change the meaning of a sentence.”

Discussion Follow-ups

For Bercot, this does not mean Scripture is unreliable; it means Christians should be honest that translation and tradition are already involved in reading Scripture.