Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
In Romans 8:4–6, Bercot notes that translators must decide whether Paul is contrasting the flesh with the Holy Spirit or with the human spirit. How would each reading shape our understanding of what God intends to accomplish in believers?
Another way to ask: In Romans 8:4–6, Bercot says translators must choose if Paul means the flesh is against the Holy Spirit or against the human spirit. How would each view change what we think God wants to do in believers?

Direct Answer

If Romans 8 contrasts flesh with the Holy Spirit, the emphasis is on God’s Spirit as the power and focus of Christian life. If it contrasts flesh with the human spirit, then Paul may be saying that God intends believers to live from the renewed or higher part of the person rather than from the flesh.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot notes that the New American Standard capitalizes Spirit: “who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.” - He says the translators “interpreted Paul to be contrasting the flesh with the Holy Spirit, and they may be correct.” - He then adds that Paul “may have been talking about our human spirit contrasting our flesh to our spirit.” - He stresses that “if that’s what Paul meant, then the message of Romans is considerably different than what the Reformers preached.” - The passage itself contrasts “the mind set on the flesh” with “the mind set on the Spirit,” resulting in “death” versus “life and peace.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not fully develop the theological consequences of each reading, but it clearly says the difference is significant, not trivial.