Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
Bercot says the real question is not whether Christians use something besides Scripture, but whether they rely on the early Christian witness or the modern witness of pastors, writers, and theologians. Why might the early Christian witness be especially important for understanding apostolic teaching?
Another way to ask: Bercot says the real question is not whether we use sources besides Scripture, but which sources we trust: early Christians or modern teachers. Why might the early Christians help us understand the apostles better?

Direct Answer

In the transcript, Bercot suggests the early Christian witness is important because it may shed light on Scripture and preserve how the earliest believers understood and practiced apostolic teaching. He contrasts that witness with the modern witness of pastors, writers, and theologians.

Support from Transcript

- He says, β€œThe only issue is what we should use.” - He asks whether Christians will β€œrely on the historical witness of the early Christians to shed light on Scripture.” - He contrasts this with relying on β€œthe modern witness of our pastors, Christian writers, and theologians.” - In the 1 Corinthians 11 example, he says there is nothing in β€œhistoric early Christian writings” to support the study Bible note’s cultural explanation. - Later he states that β€œthe church of the 2nd century practiced all of these things listed above.” - This implies that early Christian practice is evidence for how New Testament commands were understood.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not fully explain why the early Christians are more reliable, but it presents them as historically closer to apostolic teaching and practice.