Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 2

In the example from 1 Corinthians 11, Bercot argues that the study Bible note turns Paul’s delivered “tradition” into a mere Greek custom. Why is it significant that Paul roots the head covering teaching in apostolic tradition rather than cultural preference?

Another way to ask: In 1 Corinthians 11, Bercot says a study note makes Paul's teaching on head coverings sound like only a Greek custom. Why does it matter that Paul presents it as apostolic tradition, not just culture?

Direct Answer

It is significant because, in Bercot’s reading, Paul presents the head covering as something he delivered to the churches, not as advice about adapting to Greek culture. If it is apostolic tradition, then dismissing it as a local custom contradicts Paul’s stated basis for the teaching.

Support from Transcript

- The study Bible note says Paul was addressing “Greek traditions” and “the existing custom of their day.” - Bercot responds, “But did Paul say anything about Greek customs versus Jewish customs? No.” - He points to 1 Corinthians 11:2, where Paul commends them for “holding firmly to the traditions just as I delivered them to you.” - Bercot says, “It was Paul who delivered the tradition of the head covering to the Corinthian Christians, not the pagan Greeks.” - He concludes that “the commentator is expressly contradicting what Paul said.” - He adds that historic early Christian writings do not substantiate the commentator’s claim.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript frames the issue as whether Scripture’s own explanation should control interpretation, rather than later cultural theories.

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 2 of 10