Skip to content
The Historic Faith

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
The chapter claims that John would likely feel less at home in many twenty-first-century Western churches than in the second-century church; what does this possibility expose about our assumptions concerning biblical faithfulness, church tradition, and historical continuity?
Another way to ask: The chapter says John might feel less at home in many modern Western churches than in the second-century church. What does this show about our ideas of being biblical, following tradition, and staying connected to the early church?

Direct Answer

This possibility exposes the assumption that modern Western churches naturally represent New Testament Christianity better than the early post-apostolic church did. Bercot suggests that historical closeness to the apostles may matter more than modern readers often admit.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says modern Christians may think β€œJohn could step right from the first century into our Western 21st-century churches and feel quite at home.” - He contrasts that with the belief that John β€œwould find the second-century church to be strange and foreign.” - He responds sharply, β€œNow, who’s kidding whom?” - He argues that early Christian writings provide β€œhistoric evidence of how the primitive church understood Scripture.” - He says those writings helped him β€œtruly see the New Testament itself.” - He frames the issue as one of moving away from β€œfirst-century Christianity,” not merely finding ancient Christianity strange.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not claim the second-century church was inspired or error-free. It argues that we should not automatically assume modern interpretations are closer to the apostles than early Christian ones.