Direct Answer
This possibility exposes the assumption that modern Western churches naturally represent New Testament Christianity better than the early post-apostolic church did. Bercot suggests that historical closeness to the apostles may matter more than modern readers often admit.
Support from Transcript
- Bercot says modern Christians may think βJohn could step right from the first century into our Western 21st-century churches and feel quite at home.β - He contrasts that with the belief that John βwould find the second-century church to be strange and foreign.β - He responds sharply, βNow, whoβs kidding whom?β - He argues that early Christian writings provide βhistoric evidence of how the primitive church understood Scripture.β - He says those writings helped him βtruly see the New Testament itself.β - He frames the issue as one of moving away from βfirst-century Christianity,β not merely finding ancient Christianity strange.
Discussion Follow-ups
The transcript does not claim the second-century church was inspired or error-free. It argues that we should not automatically assume modern interpretations are closer to the apostles than early Christian ones.