Skip to content
The Historic Faith

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Paul says the law about oxen was “written for our sake”; how might this challenge the common modern assumption that Old Testament laws are either directly binding or mostly irrelevant, rather than containing spiritual principles for Christians?
Another way to ask: Paul said the law about oxen was "written for our sake." How does this challenge the modern idea that Old Testament laws are either still required or mostly useless?

Direct Answer

Paul’s statement challenges a simple either-or approach to Old Testament law by showing that a Mosaic command can contain a principle written “for our sake.” According to the transcript, such laws may instruct Christians spiritually even when the literal regulation is not the immediate issue.

Support from Transcript

- Paul quotes the Mosaic command: “You shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing.” - He then asks, “God is not concerned about oxen, is he?” - Paul answers, “Or is he speaking altogether for our sake? Yes, for our sake it was written.” - Bercot says Paul used the passage to support his “right to receive material support.” - Bercot reflects, “Paul is pulling a spiritual principle out of the Mosaic Law that I would never have seen.” - He connects this to the possibility that Paul’s disciples saw “similar principles in the Law.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not provide a full system for applying every Old Testament law. It simply shows that Bercot sees Paul’s example as opening the door to spiritual principles embedded in the Law.