Skip to content
The Historic Faith

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Bercot emphasizes that Paul connects the head covering to creation, authority, prayer, prophecy, and “because of the angels,” rather than to local Corinthian culture. What does this suggest about God’s purposes in giving commands that may seem strange or unnecessary to modern Christians?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Paul connects head covering to creation, authority, prayer, prophecy, and “because of the angels,” not just to Corinthian culture. What does this suggest about God’s reasons for commands that may seem strange to modern Christians?

Direct Answer

The transcript suggests that some commands may have purposes rooted in divine order, worship, authority, and realities beyond human cultural preference, even when modern readers find them strange. Bercot argues that Paul’s own reasons should be accepted rather than replaced with cultural explanations not found in the passage.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says Paul’s instructions are connected “to the order of creation and to the angels.” - He quotes verse 10: “Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head because of the angels.” - He criticizes the idea that the passage was only about women not being mistaken for “prostitutes or pagan priestesses.” - He asks why, if that cultural explanation were true, “is part of it addressed to men?” - He says no early Christians claimed Paul’s instructions were “merely a concession to Greek culture.” - He also says “Nobody claimed that they had anything to do with prostitutes or pagan priestesses.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not fully explain what “because of the angels” means. But it insists that Paul’s stated reasons must not be nullified by modern explanations.