Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
The chapter contrasts “knowing a whole bunch of man’s fancy doctrines” with “following Jesus in an obedient love-faith relationship”; how can a person discern whether study and doctrine are producing deeper obedience or merely religious confidence?
Another way to ask: The chapter contrasts knowing many fancy doctrines with following Jesus in loving obedience and faith. How can someone tell if their study is leading to deeper obedience or only to religious pride?

Direct Answer

According to the transcript, study and doctrine should be tested by whether they lead to obedient love, holiness, service, crossbearing, and a serious response to Jesus’ words. If they produce only confidence in “fancy doctrines” while explaining away Jesus’ teachings, the transcript warns they may be empty or misleading.

Support from Transcript

- The transcript contrasts “knowing a whole bunch of man’s fancy doctrines” with “following Jesus in an obedient love-faith relationship.” - It calls some doctrines “mere speculations and myths” when they replace obedience. - The early Christians are valued because they lived “holy lives according to a serious and literal reading of the Scriptures.” - The speaker praises “simple holiness, unfailing love, and patient crossbearing.” - Theologians are criticized for “unprovable speculations as dogma” and “creative and fanciful interpretations.” - The transcript commends books that produce “challenging, life-changing, no-compromising” discipleship.

Discussion Follow-ups

A practical test from the transcript would be: is my study making me more like the early Christians in holiness and love, or only more able to defend a system?