Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
The lesson emphasizes “plurality of leadership” as an apostolic principle (“bishops…deacons” always plural) and connects it to Jesus choosing the Twelve; what do you think God is protecting the church from by insisting on shared authority rather than a single pastor model?
Another way to ask: If the New Testament usually shows multiple leaders instead of one main pastor, what problems do you think God is trying to prevent by sharing authority?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests God was protecting the church from authority being concentrated in “just in one man,” so that leadership would be mutual, accountable, and less vulnerable to misuse of power. Bercot presents plurality as an “apostolic principle” that keeps oversight tied to the whole body of proven leaders rather than a single personality.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot notes in established churches it is “always bishops plural… and deacons plural,” and “You never read… the presence of a single pastor.”
  • He calls plurality “an important apostolic principle” and ties it to Jesus selecting “the 12,” implying shared ministry from the start.
  • He states the purpose: “he wanted the ministry to always be plural, that authority would not reside just in one man.”
  • Even when the threefold system appears, Ignatius’s bishop is not portrayed as a lone ruler; early bishops functioned as “first among equals” and “chairman or coordinating elder.”
  • He contrasts modern patterns where one “professionally trained” pastor may function as the main shepherd while deacons/elders often handle programs/finances.
Discussion Follow-ups How might plurality change the way counseling, discipline, teaching, and financial decisions happen in a congregation compared with the “hired pastor” model?