Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Christian Citizenship  /  What is a Kingdom Christian?  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 5
He says kingdom Christians interpret Scripture by starting with Jesus’ teachings, refusing to interpret epistles in a way that contradicts Jesus, and not treating the Old Testament as the “final statement” on Christian living; what doctrines or ethical issues today feel like they are commonly built from Romans or the Old Testament first, and what happens to those positions if the Sermon on the Mount is treated as the controlling authority?
Another way to ask: What beliefs or moral issues today are often built from Romans or the Old Testament first instead of Jesus’ teachings? If the Sermon on the Mount had the final say, how would those views change?

Direct Answer Bercot’s main examples of issues reshaped by starting with Jesus are war/nonresistance, oaths, wealth, and class distinctions—areas where conventional Christians often lean on Romans 13 or Old Testament patterns to soften Jesus’ commands. If the Sermon on the Mount becomes controlling, those issues move from “optional” or “explained away” to direct obedience to Jesus’ plain teaching.

Support from Transcript:

  • Kingdom method: “On any given subject, kingdom Christians look first at what Jesus taught…[and] will never interpret the epistles in such a way that they contradict what Jesus has plainly said.”
  • They “never look to the Old Testament as the final statement on how we are to live today,” because “Jesus’ teachings surpass those of the Old Testament law.”
  • Conventional method: they “go to the epistles for their doctrines…make…Romans the central writing,” and if Jesus seems to contradict Paul, they “interpret Jesus” to fit their Romans reading.
  • He says early Christians pointed pagans to “the Sermon on the Mount, not…Romans.”
  • He shows consequences: on war, Jesus’ enemy-love and nonresistance leads to “we can’t go to war,” while conventional preachers bless killing.
  • On oaths: Jesus said “do not swear at all,” yet theologians created loopholes; kingdom Christians refused oaths across centuries.
  • On wealth: OT wealth as blessing vs Jesus saying wealth is a hindrance; kingdom Christians treat wealth as something to use for the needy and the kingdom.
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you personally feel pressure to “reinterpret Jesus” because of a favorite doctrine or a patriotic expectation? What would it cost to let Jesus’ words be the final word?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next