Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
The lesson claims God’s kingdom is “here and now in the true disciples” and “not…symbolic or figurative”; what does this imply about what God intends the church to visibly look like inside a nation, and how would a watching pagan (like Rome) be able to “take note” that another kingdom is present?
Another way to ask: If God’s kingdom is real “here and now” in true disciples, what should the church look like in public inside a nation? What would make non-Christians clearly notice that a different kingdom is present?

Direct Answer Bercot implies the church should be a visibly distinct community inside a nation—so different in values and daily practices that outsiders can recognize it as another “national organization” with its own way of life.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says the kingdom is “here and now” and “something real…concrete” with “laws…values…leadership, and…worldview.”
  • Origen describes “another national organization…founded by the Word of God,” where Christians “rule over churches,” not the state.
  • Bercot says early Christians were “a stark reality…citizens of a different kingdom,” and “the Romans took note…how different, how peculiar these Christians were.”
  • Tertullian says “nothing is ever said seen or heard” among Christians that shares in the “madness of the circus…the immodesty of the theater…the atrocities of the arena.”
  • He notes pagans didn’t call them liars; they called them “peculiar,” even “enemies of the human race,” showing the difference was observable.
Discussion Follow-ups What visible practices today would make a pagan say, “These people belong to another kingdom,” rather than “They’re basically like us”?