Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Bible and Early Church History  /  Who's Who in the Early Church?  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 7
In describing Tertullian, Bercot highlights his zeal, his harsh tone, and his fight against “spiritual laxity,” then notes his later attraction to the Montanists who claimed new Spirit-given guidance and practiced ascetic rigor. How do you discern the difference between Spirit-led seriousness and an unhealthy slide into harsher, “new commandment” rigor—especially when the stated goal is holiness?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Tertullian was intense about holiness and later joined the Montanists, who claimed new guidance from the Spirit and strict practices. How can you tell the difference between Spirit-led seriousness and drifting into harsh “new rules,” even when the goal is holiness?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s description, one discernment clue is whether “seriousness” stays anchored in the church’s received faith and humility, or whether it turns into extra, allegedly Spirit-given lifestyle commands and criticism of the wider church. The transcript doesn’t give a full test for discernment, but it implies that claiming “new commandments” and becoming increasingly judgmental can signal an unhealthy rigor.

Support from Transcript:

  • Tertullian is described as “zealous in his devotion to Christ,” defending Christianity and fighting “spiritual laxity.”
  • Bercot contrasts tone: Tertullian often writes in a “strong, even judgmental spirit… one of the harshest.”
  • Montanists are described as Orthodox doctrinally, but they claimed the Spirit was giving “new commandments on lifestyle issues or at least new guidance,” and were known for “ascetic rigor.”
  • Bercot notes a progression: early works show “no signs at all of Montanism,” then “little clues,” then later he “thoroughly embraced” it.
  • In that later phase, Tertullian “criticizes the institutional church, usually on matters of discipline,” suggesting a shift from reforming to separating/attacking.
Discussion Follow-ups Is the fruit in a movement mainly love and gentleness, or mainly suspicion and condemnation? When we push for holiness, do we rely on Scripture’s commands—or do we subtly add “new” rules and treat them as divine?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next