Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Bible and Early Church History  /  Who's Who in the Early Church?  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 5
Bercot emphasizes that multiple apologists (Justin, Athenagoras, etc.) “harmonize with each other” across decades and regions, suggesting a shared Christian outlook. What doctrines and lifestyle positions does Bercot specifically say Justin addresses (e.g., eternal security, war, entertainment, abortion), and how does the idea of broad early agreement pressure modern claims like “Christians have always differed on that”?
Another way to ask: Bercot says several early Christian writers agreed with each other across different places and years. What beliefs and lifestyle topics does he say Justin clearly talks about (like eternal security, war, entertainment, abortion), and how does that early agreement challenge the idea that “Christians have always disagreed on that”?

Direct Answer Bercot says Justin’s First Apology covers a wide range of doctrines (including Trinity, salvation, and eternal security) and lifestyle positions (including war, entertainment, and abortion). Because Bercot claims later apologists “harmonize” with Justin across time and geography, it pressures the modern claim that early Christians were deeply divided on these basics.

Support from Transcript:

  • Justin’s First Apology reveals beliefs about “the Trinity, about salvation, eternal security, baptism, communion, life after death, judgment day.”
  • It also reveals ethical stances: “war… entertainment, abortion, and other lifestyle issues.”
  • Bercot calls it valuable because it reports what Christians practiced “just 50 years after the last apostle died,” an “objective window” around AD 150.
  • On Athenagoras (c. 177), Bercot says his apology is valuable because different works “harmonize with each other… written decades apart and from different parts” of the Mediterranean.
  • He concludes: “the apologists and other Christian writers of the second century all say basically the same things,” implying broad agreement.
Discussion Follow-ups When modern Christians say, “believers have always disagreed,” are they talking about later centuries rather than the second century? Which issues today do we assume are ‘open-handed’ that the early apologists treated as part of Christian identity?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next