Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Bible and Early Church History  /  What Happened After Acts  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
The lesson treats the Thaddeus/Edessa account as credible because Eusebius claimed to have seen “official records of the city”; how should a serious Christian weigh written historical sources, legends, and church tradition when they cannot be verified the way Scripture can—especially when miracles are involved?
Another way to ask: If Eusebius says he saw official city records about Thaddeus, how should Christians judge old writings, legends, and church tradition when they can’t be checked like Scripture—especially when miracles are claimed?

Direct Answer Bercot’s approach suggests a serious Christian should distinguish between unsupported legends and claims grounded in early written historical sources, giving more weight to accounts reported by recognized historians who cite records—even while admitting these sources are not Scripture. When miracles are involved, he doesn’t dismiss them automatically but ties credibility to the quality of the testimony and documentation.

Support from Transcript:

  • He begins by separating “legends floating around” from what he will use: “relying only upon the written historical sources… Josephus… Eusebius… pre-nicene Christians.”
  • He says legends “probably have an element of truth,” but he intentionally limits his message to written sources.
  • On Edessa: he admits it “may sound like some sort of legend,” yet says Eusebius records it and claimed “he was actually there in Odessa, and he saw the official records of the city.”
  • He argues these events have “as much or more historical support as virtually any other event from this same time period.”
  • Even with healing (Agbar being healed), the transcript models evaluating the claim through source reliability rather than through “it can’t happen.”
Discussion Follow-ups What standards should we use for “weight” (early date, multiple witnesses, hostile sources like Tacitus/Josephus, etc.)? Where should we draw a line between helpful tradition and binding belief?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next