Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
Tertullian tells the Roman rulers that “truth…knows that she is but a sojourner on the earth” and only asks “not to be condemned unknown”; what does that reveal about God’s relationship to earthly power, and how should Christians respond when legal systems don’t want “the real truth” in public?
Another way to ask: Tertullian says truth is only passing through this world and just wants a fair hearing. What does that say about God’s rule compared to earthly governments, and how should Christians respond when laws don’t want the truth said in public?

Direct Answer Tertullian portrays “truth” as not dependent on earthly courts for her home, honor, or reward, yet he insists rulers still have a duty to hear facts before condemning. Christians, then, should persist in respectful witness—seeking a fair hearing and speaking truth—without acting as if God’s cause rises or falls with earthly power.

Support from Transcript:

  • He tells rulers they are “afraid to openly inquire into… the real truth,” and Christians are often not “permitted to defend ourselves.”
  • He says, “Truth has no appeals… She knows that she is but a sojourner on the earth… her… hope… recompense… honors are above.”
  • Yet “there is one thing that truth anxiously desires… that is not to be condemned unknown.”
  • He argues justice requires “public inquiry with the carefulness which becomes justice” and calls it wrong to “condemn anybody undefended and unheard.”
  • He still sends truth by “the secret pathway of this silent book,” implying patient, orderly testimony even when denied a platform.
Discussion Follow-ups How can Christians pursue legal fairness without becoming bitter or panicked? What “silent book” equivalents (written explanations, calm testimony) can we use today when public systems refuse a hearing?