Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Reformation History  /  Lecture 6: The Early Lives of Zwingli and Conrad Grebel  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 6
Grebel’s moral collapse in Paris (excess drinking, brawls, disease, being cut off financially) led him to sign a letter, “a poor, little, miserable friend of yours,” and Dean comments, “God’s about to redeem this loser”; how does this story reshape what you believe God is willing to do with deep shame and consequences, and what does it expose about how churches decide who is “usable” for serious ministry?
Another way to ask: How does Grebel’s failure and shame change what you think God can do with someone who has messed up badly? What does it reveal about how churches decide who is fit for serious ministry?

Direct Answer Dean Taylor uses Grebel’s shame and collapse to argue that God can genuinely redeem someone who looks spiritually ruined, and that a ruined reputation is not the final word if God converts and calls a person. It exposes how easily churches might write people off based on their worst season instead of watching for true change.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean describes Grebel’s Paris life as “drink more to excess,” involvement in a brawl where “some… students were killed,” and “illness due to his loose living.”
  • Grebel connected suffering to sin, confessing pains and sickness possibly from “diseases… from his loose living,” with “boils and sores,” swollen joints, and inability to write.
  • His father, “incensed,” “cut out all the money,” and Grebel returned home “his high hopes disappointed.”
  • Grebel signs a letter: “Conrad Grebel of Zurich, a poor, little, miserable friend of yours,” showing deep self-disgust.
  • Dean’s point is explicit: “God’s about to redeem this loser… don’t ever give up on people. God didn’t give up on Conrad Grebel.”
Discussion Follow-ups What markers would you look for to distinguish real repentance from temporary regret? How should a church hold both truths at once: serious consequences for sin and real hope for future usefulness?

Jumpstarter 6 of 10
Back Questions Next