Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Reformation History  /  Lecture 6: The Early Lives of Zwingli and Conrad Grebel  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
The “sausage incident” during Lent became the first public controversy around Zwingli, and he defended it with a sermon titled *Regarding the Choice and Freedom of Foods*; how should Christians discern when breaking a long-standing church practice is faithful “freedom” and when it is merely provocative self-assertion, especially given that some fasting traditions do reach back into early church practice?
Another way to ask: How can Christians tell when breaking an old church practice is real Christian freedom and when it’s just trying to shock or prove a point? How should we think about this if some fasting traditions go back to the early church?

Direct Answer Dean Taylor presents the sausage incident as a deliberate, conscience-level challenge to rules treated as legally binding, not merely a preference issue; discernment involves whether the practice has become coercive and “unscriptural,” and whether the action is aimed at reforming obedience to God rather than just stirring controversy.

Support from Transcript:

  • The incident was “consciously” done: “Zwingli and about a dozen other participants consciously transgressed the fasting rule by cutting and distributing two smoked sausages.”
  • Dean explains Lent in that era was not just tradition but “actually a legal thing” with enforced food restrictions.
  • Zwingli defended the act publicly with a sermon, later published: “Regarding the Choice and Freedom of Foods,” showing he treated it as a principle dispute.
  • Dean notes the fast has ancient roots: “a 40-day fast before Easter actually dates way back into the early church,” even if later food rules became more rigorous.
  • The transcript emphasizes the “tone” of the time: they were “starting to talk about all these rituals,” and this was one more flashpoint.
Discussion Follow-ups When we challenge a tradition today, are we doing it because Scripture requires it, or because we dislike restraint? How can we keep reform from becoming careless disrespect for older Christians’ consciences?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next