Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Reformation History  /  Lecture 4: The Church Councils and the Pilgrim Church  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 8
Dean describes the Seventh Council’s anathemas on images, including a curse on those with “a doubtful mind” who won’t confess “with their whole hearts” that they venerate images, and then contrasts that with Jesus’ warnings about “Lord, Lord” and building on sand. What does this contrast teach about God’s priorities, and how might modern Christians create their own versions of “anathema for doubt” around secondary issues?
Another way to ask: What does the contrast between harsh curses for doubt about images and Jesus’ warnings about empty words (“Lord, Lord”) say about what God cares about most? Where do Christians today punish doubt or disagreement on lesser issues in similar ways?

Direct Answer Dean’s contrast suggests God prioritizes obedience to Jesus’ kingdom teachings and genuine relationship with Christ over forced certainty on disputed practices; the councils demanded absolute conformity (even punishing doubt), while Jesus warned that calling him “Lord” without doing his words ends in collapse. Modern Christians can mimic this by treating secondary standards as salvation tests and shaming or excluding those who aren’t fully convinced.

Support from Transcript:

  • Seventh Council curses: “Anathema… to those who even… have a doubtful mind and do not confess with their whole hearts that they venerate the sacred images.”
  • Multiple anathemas equate non-compliance with damnation: “If you don’t do this, you’re going to hell.”
  • Dean responds with Jesus’ priorities: “These weren’t the things that he said would be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
  • He cites Jesus’ warnings: building “rock upon the sand… great would be the fall,” and “many will call me, ‘Lord, Lord’… and I’ll say, ‘I never knew you.’”
  • He concludes the “target” moved far from Christ, “out here.”
  • His modern analogy shows how communities enforce “white tennis shoes” and eventually “excommunicate,” echoing anathema logic.
Discussion Follow-ups Where do we demand “whole-hearted” certainty on issues Jesus didn’t make central? How do we protect conscience while still pursuing faithfulness together?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next