Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Reformation History  /  Lecture 3: Early Church Problems and Constantine  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
Marcion rejected the Old Testament God as “evil,” denied Jesus’ birth from Mary, and leaned toward universal salvation; what does this controversy reveal about God’s consistency across Old and New Testaments, and why would the early church see a “New Testament-only” God as spiritually dangerous?
Another way to ask: What does the Marcion debate teach about God being the same God in both the Old and New Testaments, and why did the early church think a “New Testament-only” God was dangerous?

Direct Answer The transcript presents Marcion as spiritually dangerous because he split God into two competing gods and reshaped Jesus to fit his theory, which undermines the “real Jesus” and the church’s public, shared faith.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean says Marcion concluded “the creator of this world was a lesser, an evil God,” and “the God of the Old Testament was an evil being,” while the NT Father was “a loving God.”
  • Marcion “did not believe that Jesus was born of Mary…since that would make Jesus part of the old world,” meaning his Christ is not the same Christ the apostles preached.
  • He also taught “there would be no judgment” and “universal salvation…because Jesus would forgive everyone.”
  • Marcion produced an early canon list, liking “Luke and the letters of Paul,” showing how a “New Testament-only” approach can become selective and self-justifying.
  • Dean notes the church responded by making “orthodox lists of scriptures” and developing creeds—implying this controversy forced the church to insist on continuity and public doctrine.
Discussion Follow-ups What happens to discipleship and repentance if someone removes judgment and rewrites who Jesus is?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next