Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
Dean Taylor highlighted early Anabaptist conversion numbers (e.g., Hans Hut “12,000,” St. Gall “around 500,” Baumann’s “10,378”), arguing that “revival and missions…go hand in hand”; what assumptions about the Spirit’s work, the church’s responsibility, and the normal Christian life are embedded in the way these stories are told?
Another way to ask: When people tell these big conversion stories, what do they assume about how the Spirit works, what the church must do, and what “normal” Christian life looks like? Why do they link revival and missions so closely?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests Taylor assumes the Spirit’s work normally produces visible conversion and outward spread, and that the church’s responsibility is to actively take the gospel everywhere as a built-in feature of authentic revival. He tells these stories as if mission is not an “extra,” but a normal overflow of living faith.

Support from Transcript:

  • Taylor frames the earliest years as inherently missional: “missions was part of it from the very beginning,” and “revival and missions…tend to go hand in hand.”
  • The conversion statistics are presented as evidence of spontaneous gospel advance: “spontaneous flowing of the gospel and conversions and missions.”
  • He lists multiple leaders and numbers (e.g., “Hans Hut, 12,000,” St. Gall “around 500,” Baumann “10,378”) to show scale and momentum, not isolated cases.
  • Taylor says the “desire to take the gospel everywhere was built into the Anabaptist vision,” implying this is what the Spirit forms in a renewed people.
  • He critiques Binder’s “Anabaptist vision” for not including mission burden, calling that omission “a bit of a shame,” which implies missions should be assumed in any true account.
Discussion Follow-ups Do we expect the Spirit’s work to produce multiplication and sending, or mainly internal encouragement? If mission is “normal,” what changes in how we measure health and faithfulness?