Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 1
Dean Taylor says the group today “looks the most like…Holland, 1700,” especially in “intellectualism, materialism, splitting, [and] lack of vision”; what specific parallels did you feel exposed by, and what parts of your own church life most resemble “Holland, 1700” rather than “Switzerland, 1530”?
Another way to ask: What things in the group today felt most like “Holland, 1700” (like thinking too much, loving money, splitting up, or lacking vision)? Where do you see those same patterns in your own church life instead of “Switzerland, 1530”?

Direct Answer Based on Dean Taylor’s teaching, the strongest parallels are the temptation to become respectable and comfortable (materially and socially), while losing spiritual “vision,” and the tendency to fracture into competing groups.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean says the “biggest lesson” is “Holland, 1700” because we resemble their “intellectualism, the materialism, the splitting, the kind of lack of vision.”
  • He warns he’s not “throw[ing] stones,” but wants it to be “a serious time for us to look at ourselves and say, ‘Hey, how does that apply to us?’”
  • The Dutch slide shows Mennonites “ascend the social ladder…to practically royalty,” and he says “somehow…they started to really lose out a lot of the vision of why they were there.”
  • He describes becoming “upper class…high society,” with mansions, bankers (“Dopgesinden financiers”), and “no lines or limits.”
  • He ties decline to becoming “lax…open…in the open,” where church and businesses flourish, but spiritual seriousness weakens.
Discussion Follow-ups Which “comfort” pressures in your setting most pull believers from clear discipleship: wealth, reputation, or the desire to be seen as reasonable?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next