Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 2

The Brethren of the Common Life stressed the inner life and produced writings like *Imitation of Christ* (“What good does it do for us to debate on the Trinity if we don’t have the Trinity within our heart?”); how would early Christians have evaluated that emphasis on inner devotion alongside visible obedience, and where do modern churches drift toward either empty externals or private spirituality?

Another way to ask: How would early Christians judge a strong focus on inner devotion if it isn’t matched by visible obedience? Where do churches today lean toward empty religious actions or, on the other side, a private faith with little obedience?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests early renewal movements valued the “inner life” because outward religion without real devotion is hollow, yet Dean also insists Scripture must form a visible, obedient church. So the inner life was meant to deepen obedience, not replace it with private spirituality.

Support from Transcript:

Dean says the Brethren of the Common Life “stressed the inner life” and warned that “these external things… if there’s not a true inner life of devotion, then we’ve lost it.”
He highlights Thomas à Kempis: “What good does it do… to debate on the Trinity if we don’t have the Trinity within our heart?”
He notes mixed value: *Imitation of Christ* is “a good book,” though parts on sacraments could be “offensive,” implying discernment is needed.
Dean repeatedly anchors evaluation in Scripture: “What does the scripture say about these things?”
He later praises Dirk Philips for being “very strong… in the visible church,” showing inner devotion must connect to visible community and obedience.

Discussion Follow-ups What outward practices in our churches risk becoming mere “external things”? On the other side, where do we excuse disobedience by calling it “just me and God” spirituality?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 2 of 10