Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
In the humility discussion, Finny critiques the Calvinist accusation that non-Calvinists are proud and calls Calvinist humility “bizarre” because it can feel like being “one of the lucky ones”; how do the competing frameworks (irresistible grace vs prevenient grace) change what it would even mean to boast, to be grateful, or to feel “chosen”?
Another way to ask: How do irresistible grace and prevenient grace change what it means to brag, to be thankful, or to feel “chosen”? In each view, what would humility look like?

Direct Answer Finny argues Calvinism can unintentionally create a “lucky ones” mindset because selection feels arbitrary, while prevenient grace undercuts boasting because God gives enabling grace broadly. In his framing, gratitude is still essential, but boasting makes less sense when everyone receives God’s enabling initiative.

Support from Transcript:

  • He reports the accusation: Calvinists say, “You non-Calvinists are such proud people…because it’s been your response to God.”
  • He calls Calvinist humility “very bizarre,” rooted in being “arbitrarily…chosen by God” (he notes “Jonathan Edwards’ word”).
  • He paraphrases the psychology: “out of 100 people…I’m one of the lucky ones that got picked…so I get to be really humble.”
  • He uses Leighton Flowers’ analogy: if only a few have a rare gift, they can boast; if “everyone was born able…equally well,” boasting “would not make any sense.”
  • He applies it directly: “Calvinism leaves more room for boasting…But in Prevenient Grace, everybody gets it.”
Discussion Follow-ups How do you cultivate gratitude without a “special status” mentality? What should “chosen” mean if it is connected to faith and God’s foreknowledge rather than an arbitrary selection?