Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
Finny said the Calvinist portrayal of God is “if not outright blasphemy, awful close,” quoting Roger Olson’s comparison (“what’s the difference between God and Satan… God is even worse than Satan” under Calvinism), and he pointed to 86 biblical passages supporting conditional salvation against perseverance of the saints; how can a group speak with both urgency and humility to Calvinist friends—pleading for God’s honor and biblical clarity—without slipping into contempt, fear-based rhetoric, or pride?
Another way to ask: Finny said the Calvinist picture of God badly dishonors God, and he argued for conditional salvation instead of perseverance of the saints. How can you talk to Calvinist friends with urgency and respect—seeking truth and God’s honor—without becoming hateful, prideful, or fear-driven?

Direct Answer

Finny models urgent, serious pleading grounded in Scripture and God’s honor, while still refusing to pronounce Calvinists as automatically lost. Humility shows up by reasoning patiently, focusing on biblical passages, and inviting dialogue rather than mockery.

Support from Transcript:

  • He uses strong language about the system because it affects God’s character: Calvinism’s view of God is “if not outright blasphemy, awful close,” and “morally… absolutely horrific.”
  • He frames the goal as persuasion, not contempt: “we ought to be reasoning with them… ‘Hey, consider what you’re believing here.’”
  • He appeals to God’s honor: Calvinists talk about “God’s glory,” but he asks why that is “counteract[ed]” by depictions “so contrary” to justice and goodness.
  • He emphasizes clear Scripture on conditional salvation, citing “a list of 86 passages… affirm conditional salvation,” with concrete examples (vine/branches cut off, olive tree, unforgiving servant).
  • He explicitly guards against prideful condemnation: “I’m not saying that every last Calvinist is lost… by no means,” yet he calls it “a dangerous place to be.”
  • He recommends practical, respectful steps: “have dialogue… watch these lectures… read some of the books,” noting many simply lack exposure to “the other side.”
Discussion Follow-ups

How can you keep the focus on God’s character and the text of Scripture rather than on winning an argument? What tone and habits would help your group speak boldly while still sounding like people who fear God and love their neighbor?