Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Change of Allegiance  /  What If? Practical Questions About Nonresistance  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
Dean says critics often “attempt to make a case to show why the Scriptures simply can’t be saying what they are obviously saying”; where have you seen that impulse in your own thinking or church culture, and what does it reveal about what we’re trying to protect?
Another way to ask: Where have you seen yourself or your church try to explain away what Scripture seems to plainly say? What do you think you were trying to protect?

Direct Answer Based on Dean Taylor’s teaching, that impulse shows up when we feel pressured by Jesus’ clear words and then try to reinterpret them so we don’t have to face the cost—especially the cost of suffering or death. It reveals we may be protecting our life, our comfort, or “the American dream” more than simple obedience to Christ.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean says that when people feel “challenged” by the Scriptures, they often aren’t centered on what the text says but try “to make a case to show why the Scriptures simply can't be saying what they are obviously saying.”
  • He connects this to difficulty: “a lot of these things are hard. They're difficult… sometimes it means us dying.”
  • He warns that if we read Scripture aiming to preserve “your American way of life or the American dream,” Jesus’ teaching “aren't going to make sense.”
  • He contrasts that with reading “very plainly and simply” and “not try[ing] to save our own life.”
  • The repeated pushback comes through “everyday, well, what if types of questions,” suggesting avoidance rather than submission.
Discussion Follow-ups What “way of life” do we assume God must protect for us? How might fear of suffering be shaping our Bible interpretation without us noticing?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next