Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
In answering Romans 13, Taylor emphasized that “God governs this earth regardless someone is in His will or not,” and pointed out that Paul called Nero “a minister of God”; how does that challenge modern instincts to either demonize government or baptize a preferred party, and what does honoring rulers without idolatry actually require in practice?
Another way to ask: If God can use even rulers like Nero, how does that challenge the way people either hate the government or treat their party like God’s side? What does it look like to respect leaders without making them idols?

Direct Answer Taylor’s Romans 13 point challenges both anti-government suspicion and party-worship: God can use even wicked rulers for order, while Christians still belong to a different kingdom and must honor authorities without making them ultimate.

Support from Transcript:

  • He states the principle: “God governs this earth regardless someone is in His will or not. He will not let… anarchy.”
  • He stresses the Nero example: the “minister of God… was Nero, a wicked king who was persecuting the church,” yet “Nero himself was put there by God.”
  • He ties it to two kingdoms: civil sword-structures are “given to them by God… but they are outside of the perfection of Christ.”
  • He contrasts law vs grace: without grace we need “law and the fear of the sword,” but under grace an “inward law” governs.
  • On idolatry, he says we can “respect them without them being our idol,” and practices include “honor them, pay our taxes, pray for them.”
  • He warns against a “kind of anti-authority, anti-government sort of feel… it’s really not of God.”
Discussion Follow-ups How do we show honor (taxes, prayer, respect) while refusing the “fervor” that treats politics as salvation? Where do we slip into contempt for rulers instead of the spirit Scripture calls for?