Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 7
Taylor says Jesus’ kingdom goal is not happiness but that “our entire lives…are consumed” to glorify God, and he connects this to “Glory to God in the highest” and Romans 11:36; how does that reordering of purpose challenge common evangelical ways of describing the “good life,” “God’s will,” or even the point of salvation?
Another way to ask: If the goal of Jesus’ kingdom is God’s glory more than your happiness, how does that challenge common Christian ideas about the “good life,” “God’s will,” or even salvation?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, Taylor’s reordering challenges any “good life” or “God’s will” framing that centers on personal happiness, success, or security; instead, salvation and daily living are aimed at glorifying God in everything.

Support from Transcript:

  • Taylor states the contrast plainly: “the all-encompassing goal is not our happiness and earthly accomplishments.”
  • Positive replacement: “in all our pursuit [we are] to love God and to glorify him with every aspect of our lives.”
  • Totalizing language: “our entire lives, including our ambitions, happiness, decisions, and desires, are consumed to this end: to glorify God.”
  • He anchors this in Scripture: angels proclaim “Glory to God in the highest,” and Paul says, “For of him and through him and to him are all things, to whom be glory forever.”
  • He critiques the American dream as a rival storyline: “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” had shaped him, but it undermined real trust.
Discussion Follow-ups How often do Christians describe God mainly as a path to stability or fulfillment? What would change in how you talk about salvation if “to him be glory” became the headline rather than “God wants you happy”?