Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
A Change of Allegiance  /  Chapter 9, The Pilgrim Church  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 9
Menno Simons contrasts Caesar’s realm with the Christian’s weapons (“our sword is the sword of the Spirit… patience our weapon of defense”) and leaves “iron and metal spears and swords” to those who value human blood like “swine’s blood”; what does this reveal about God’s valuation of human life and the nature of Christ’s kingdom, and how does it challenge common Christian arguments for “necessary” violence?
Another way to ask: What does Menno Simons’ contrast between spiritual weapons and metal weapons show about how God values human life and what Christ’s kingdom is like? How does it challenge the idea that violence is sometimes “necessary” for Christians?

Direct Answer Menno’s contrast implies that Christ’s kingdom advances through spiritual means—faith, patience, the Word, and the Spirit—not through killing, and that human blood is precious, never to be treated casually. This challenges “necessary violence” arguments by saying regenerated Christians “do not go to war” and that Christian weapons are for defeating the devil’s kingdom, not destroying people and nations.

Support from Transcript:

  • Menno states plainly: “The regenerated do not go to war, nor engage in strife… and know of no war.”
  • He distinguishes loyalties: “render unto Caesar… and unto God…,” implying different realms with different tools.
  • He defines Christian weaponry: “Their sword is the sword of the Spirit… patience our weapon of defense, the word of God our sword.”
  • He rejects physical destruction: “Our weapons are not weapons with which cities and countries may be destroyed… and human blood shed in torrents.”
  • He frames the real battle spiritually: weapons that destroy “the spiritual kingdom of the devil.”
  • He condemns devaluing life: leaving iron swords to those who regard “human blood and swine’s blood” as nearly equal.
Discussion Follow-ups What arguments for “necessary” violence rely on trusting physical force to stop evil, and how does Menno’s view redirect that trust?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next