Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 2
Clyde wonders why God has blessed Anabaptists for “a couple generations”—how does that question expose competing beliefs about God’s intentions in blessing (comfort, stability, prosperity) versus God’s purposes (mission, mercy), and what evidence in our spending, schedules, and church life shows which story we actually believe?
Another way to ask: When Clyde asks why God has “blessed” Anabaptists, what does that show about different beliefs—does God bless us for comfort and success, or for mission and mercy? What do our budgets, calendars, and church routines show we really believe?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript suggests Clyde sees blessing as a test of purpose: either we “consume more for myself” or we use God’s gifts for mercy and mission. What we do with “fullness of food,” free time, and money—whether self-focused comfort or serving the needy and reaching neighbors—reveals which story we believe.

Support from Transcript:
  • He asks why God blesses Anabaptists: “Is it so I can consume more for myself, or does God have something different in mind?”
  • He calls churches to be “more than just for our families,” linking blessing to outward purpose.
  • He applies Ezekiel to comfortable church life: “pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness… Sounds like a lot of Anabaptist churches.”
  • He probes our time use: “We maybe are very busy, but doing what? Serving self or pursuing our passions?”
  • He contrasts spending priorities: neighbors should wonder why we choose “investing in needy situations over a hunting trip or an expensive fishing trip.”
  • He ties faithfulness to mercy: quotes Proverbs about honoring God by “mercy on the needy,” and Jesus’ call to “give to the poor… take up the cross.”
Discussion Follow-ups If someone audited our calendars and budgets, what would they conclude our church exists for? Where might “fullness” be quietly shaping our theology?