Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 7
Pablo notes, “None of the churches practices non-resistance” in that neighborhood; what do you think early Christians would assume about Jesus’ commands regarding retaliation, and where do you see modern Christianity (including our own circles) quietly normalizing forms of resistance or self-protection?
Another way to ask: Pablo says none of the churches there practice non-resistance. What do you think early Christians assumed Jesus meant about not getting revenge, and where do Christians today quietly accept self-protection or fighting back?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript implies Pablo believes Jesus’ commands lead to non-resistance as a distinctive Christian practice; while he doesn’t map “early Christians” in detail, his comments suggest he sees retaliation and self-protection as commonly normalized—even by churches.

Support from Transcript:
  • He says their non-resistance shocked neighbors because “nobody does that here. None of the churches practices non-resistance.”
  • He links non-resistance to gospel credibility: people concluded, “That's got to be God.”
  • He describes refusing to “run” from danger: “our decision was not to run. And even if it meant death.”
  • He contrasts that with outside pressure: people wrote telling him “just get out of there… too much danger.”
  • He presents enemy-love actions (feeding robbers, coffee) as the expected Christian response, not a special calling.
Discussion Follow-ups What “quiet” forms of resistance do we excuse (verbal retaliation, social-media warfare, threat-based protection)? How do we tell the difference between wise caution and faithless self-preservation?