Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 8
“They stumble because they disobey the word” and “we cannot separate Jesus from what He taught”; how does this challenge the way modern evangelicalism often separates trusting Jesus from obeying Jesus, especially regarding assurance and salvation?
Another way to ask: How does “you can’t separate Jesus from what He taught” challenge the common idea that you can trust Jesus without obeying Him, especially when it comes to assurance and salvation?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The speaker’s teaching challenges any approach that claims trust in Jesus while treating obedience to His words as optional, because he says disobedience is precisely why people stumble. In his view, believing means conforming to Christ and cleaving to His teaching, and stability (not shame) is tied to that obedience.

Support from Transcript:
  • He explains stumbling directly: “They stumble because they disobey the word.”
  • He draws a firm connection: “We cannot separate Jesus from what he taught.”
  • He states what love for Jesus requires: “If you would love him, you must also cleave to his teaching.”
  • He describes teaching as spiritual necessity: it must become “like food and drink… the spiritual milk of the word.”
  • He links true belief with conformity: “When we believe in him, we conform ourselves… to him and to his life.”
  • He cites Acts 4: “There is salvation in no one else,” while still pressing obedience as the response to the cornerstone.
Discussion Follow-ups How would the speaker respond to the claim, “Obedience is important, but not connected to assurance”? Where might your own confidence be based on a profession of faith rather than the “cleaving” to Jesus’ words that he describes?