Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer

Question 10

C.S. Lewis is quoted: the “only safe rule is to give more than we can spare,” so that giving “pinches or hampers” us; what would “pinching” giving actually change this month (purchases you’d skip, upgrades you’d delay, plans you’d cancel), and what fears surface when you imagine living that way?

Another way to ask: If giving should “pinch” and make life less comfortable, what would you change this month to give that way? What fears come up when you think about living with less?

Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
In the transcript, “pinching” giving means your generosity regularly blocks comforts you would otherwise buy—so you can truthfully say, “I can’t afford this because I’ve already committed that money to the poor.” The fears that surface are often tied to covetous self-protection—wanting control, security, and the ability to plan far ahead without dependence on God.

Support from Transcript:

C.S. Lewis: “give more than we can spare…If our charity does not at all pinch or hamper us…they are too small,” and giving should exclude things “we would like to do.”
A listener applies it plainly: it should happen “frequently” that “we can’t afford something because of what we’re giving to others.”
The speaker’s step six asks if giving is “woven throughout the fabric of our lives,” not occasional.
He frames kingdom-first priorities: God promises “needs, not our wants,” when we “seek…first the kingdom.”
He connects hoarding to harm and deception: accumulation can “destroy them,” and we can be “deceived into accumulating.”
The closing comment highlights a fear-pattern: wanting “to hang on to things…accrue” and “planning so far into the future.”

Discussion Follow-ups When giving blocks a purchase, do you interpret that as loss—or as learning the “paradigm shift” where eternal treasure becomes more real than upgrades?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10