Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Question 8
After reading the Apostles’ Creed, the teacher says most Christians already share the early essentials, but “our problem isn’t that we don’t believe enough; it’s that we’re dogmatic about too many things”; if you compared your church’s statement of faith (or your personal list of “must-believes”) with the Creed, which extra items would you struggle to call “non-essentials,” and why?
Another way to ask: When you compare your church’s “must-beliefs” to the Apostles’ Creed, what extra beliefs would you have a hard time calling non-essential, and why?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript doesn’t name which “extra items” your church might add, but it argues that many disputed doctrines today were viewed as “non-essentials” by early Christians compared with the Creed’s short list. The struggle, according to the speaker, is often not lack of faith but over-dogmatism—treating too many debated points as if they were core.

Support from Transcript:
  • He reads the Apostles’ Creed and says most Christians likely already believe it: “I'm sure you believe all those things that I've just stated.”
  • He adds there may be “four or five other doctrines” early Christians saw as fundamentals, “but that's it.”
  • Key claim: “most of the doctrines that Christians argue about today were considered by the early Christians as non-essentials.”
  • “Our problem isn't that we don't believe enough. It's that we're dogmatic about too many things.”
  • He contrasts: early faith summary is “really short,” while modern statements can have “30 different points.”
Discussion Follow-ups How could your group tell the difference between contending for “once for all delivered” essentials and being dogmatic about issues the early church would not have treated as fundamentals?