Skip to content

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 6
The central argument connected sanctification to glory: sanctification = purification from sin = ceasing from sin = suffering in the flesh; when you examine your own experience of resisting temptation (“brain freeze,” “ripped apart,” “brutal”), what does it expose about how deeply you expect Christianity to feel comfortable?
Another way to ask: If fighting sin can feel painful and intense, what does that show about how much you expect the Christian life to feel easy or comfortable? What does your reaction to temptation reveal about your expectations?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
Based on the speaker’s logic, our shock at how painful temptation-resistance feels exposes an expectation that Christianity should be emotionally and physically comfortable, even though sanctification is described as a chosen suffering. The transcript frames that discomfort as normal evidence of “nailing the old man to the cross.”

Support from Transcript:
  • He defines sanctification as being “made holy… purified… set apart,” specifically “purified from sin.”
  • He connects the chain: brought to glory ? sanctification ? purification from sin ? “cease from sinning.”
  • He asks what resisting temptation feels like and the group answers: “Suffering… ripped apart… brain freeze… agonizingly painful, brutal.”
  • He uses Romans 6:6 (“our old man is crucified with him”) and illustrates everyday battles: anger with children, lust, bitterness.
  • He cites 1 Peter 4: “he who has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin,” then reframes it: “he who has ceased from sin has suffered in the flesh.”
Discussion Follow-ups If sanctification normally feels like pain, what forms of “comfortable Christianity” might actually train us to interpret holiness as abnormal or unnecessary?