Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 9
In the dream illustration, the speaker says Jesus is moving forward in conquest and offers only two options: “join Jesus or get left behind”; what parts of modern Christianity does that confront (comfort-seeking, neutrality, endless self-improvement), and what would “getting left behind” look like in a church context rather than an obvious apostasy?
Another way to ask: If the only options are to join Jesus’ mission or be left behind, what parts of modern Christianity does that challenge (comfort, staying neutral, self-help)? What might “left behind” look like inside a church, not just someone leaving the faith?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The dream confronts a Christianity that assumes Jesus is mostly waiting while we manage our private spirituality; instead, the speaker portrays Jesus as actively advancing, so neutrality becomes impossible. “Getting left behind” would look like remaining stuck—sliding backward, stalled in burdens, and not moving with Christ’s direction—while still being near Christian activity.

Support from Transcript:
  • He warns listeners to be cautious with dreams, but says it clarified following Jesus: “Take this with a grain of salt… this dream did bring some clarity.”
  • The dream image is struggle without help: “every step we took, we slid down two steps… being sucked into the violence.”
  • The man (heavenly Father) is moving steadily: “He had his head down… making progress… quickly overcame us.”
  • Help is relational attachment and shared movement: “grab onto his belt… single file… one step… equaled two steps forward.”
  • He applies it to Jesus’ mission: “Jesus is at work. He is still moving forward… Jesus is inviting us to join him in his conquest.”
  • He makes the binary explicit: “join Jesus or get left behind… does not affect the path that Jesus is taking.”
Discussion Follow-ups In your church, what does “sliding down two steps” look like—programs without progress, constant crisis management, or comfort-driven choices? How might a church be “left behind” by resisting Jesus’ direction even while keeping religious forms?